It's always good to see a scientist who gets substantial funding from ExxonMobile expressing his completely unbiased viewpoint. Why is it that most of the anti-climate change stuff you post refers to people and organizations who happen to be getting funding from the big oil companies? For a change couldn't you find someone who's in the pockets of the big car companies?
I tell you what, anonymous (generally anonymous is always a watermelon), how about I put up the unbiased opinions of those organizations funded to the tune of billions by governments to promote the AGW message? Or the governments themselves with a vested interest in using AGW as an excuse to tax us? Or the unbiased opinions of 'green' groups with a vested interest in promoting the same? Or authoritarian socialists with a vested interest in pulling on the jack boots and stomping on our faces? Anonymous, the follow the money argument might have washed about twenty years ago but it doesn't now, so kindly fuck off with your knee-jerk brainless comments.
how about I put up the unbiased opinions of those organizations funded to the tune of billions by governments to promote the AGW message? Or the governments themselves with a vested interest in using AGW as an excuse to tax us? Or the unbiased opinions of 'green' groups with a vested interest in promoting the same?
thank you. i am so fucking sick of that defense, yet how it doesn't apply to groups funded by organizations that benefit from the AGW fright myth.
"they aren't biased! they just care about the environment!"
I’ve been an engineer, barman, skip lorry driver, coalman, boat window manufacturer, contract grass cutter and builder. Now I write science fiction books, and am slowly getting over the feeling that someone is going to find me out, and can call myself a writer without wincing and ducking my head. As professions go, I prefer this one: I don’t have to clock-in, change my clothes after work, nor scrub my bollocks with detergent. I think I’ll hang around.
4 comments:
concise and brilliant.
It's always good to see a scientist who gets substantial funding from ExxonMobile expressing his completely unbiased viewpoint. Why is it that most of the anti-climate change stuff you post refers to people and organizations who happen to be getting funding from the big oil companies? For a change couldn't you find someone who's in the pockets of the big car companies?
I tell you what, anonymous (generally anonymous is always a watermelon), how about I put up the unbiased opinions of those organizations funded to the tune of billions by governments to promote the AGW message? Or the governments themselves with a vested interest in using AGW as an excuse to tax us? Or the unbiased opinions of 'green' groups with a vested interest in promoting the same? Or authoritarian socialists with a vested interest in pulling on the jack boots and stomping on our faces? Anonymous, the follow the money argument might have washed about twenty years ago but it doesn't now, so kindly fuck off with your knee-jerk brainless comments.
how about I put up the unbiased opinions of those organizations funded to the tune of billions by governments to promote the AGW message? Or the governments themselves with a vested interest in using AGW as an excuse to tax us? Or the unbiased opinions of 'green' groups with a vested interest in promoting the same?
thank you. i am so fucking sick of that defense, yet how it doesn't apply to groups funded by organizations that benefit from the AGW fright myth.
"they aren't biased! they just care about the environment!"
sure.
fuck
right
off
Post a Comment