So what's this all about?
Sunday, December 30, 2012
Tuesday, December 25, 2012
Sunday, December 23, 2012
Friday, December 21, 2012
The Windy Moon
I caught a bit of Who Wants to be a Millionaire last night
and really wish I hadn’t. The question I heard was, ‘Which of these do you find
on Earth but not on the Moon?’ and the choice of answers was: sunlight,
gravity, craters and wind. I stood there with my mouth hanging open listening
to two ‘celebs’ debating whether or not the Moon has gravity, then one of them
stating quite firmly that there was wind up there. In the end they made the
sensible decision not to commit to an answer and take the money and run.
Now, I really don’t expect people to know the names of the
main moons of Jupiter or to even be able to recite the order of the planets in
the Solar system, but a little basic scientific knowledge would be good. But
then, I was showing a lack of basic scientific knowledge too because they
couldn’t hear me while I was shouting at the television.
Thursday, December 13, 2012
Get Fracking!
Boris Johnson is here speaking some sense about fracking.
The extraction process alone would generate tens of thousands of jobs in parts of the country that desperately need them. And above all, the burning of gas to generate electricity is much, much cleaner – and produces less CO2 – than burning coal. What, as they say, is not to like?
I do love his view of the eco-doomsters:
In their mad denunciations of fracking, the Greens and the eco-warriors betray the mindset of people who cannot bear a piece of unadulterated good news. Beware this new technology, they wail. Do not tamper with the corsets of Gaia! Don’t probe her loamy undergarments with so much as a finger — or else the goddess of the earth will erupt with seismic revenge. Dig out this shale gas, they warn, and our water will be poisoned and our children will be stunted and our cattle will be victims of terrible intestinal explosions.
Tuesday, December 11, 2012
Friday, December 07, 2012
Tuesday, December 04, 2012
Ambulance, Police, Burglar...
So, I had my second encounter with Essex Police yesterday…
Let me start with my mother. She’s 85 has a lymphoma and is
undergoing chemo therapy. She lives alone in the stupidly large family home
which she can just about manage. The week before last she called me to say she
needed to go to the hospital. I shot round to find her suffering from the shakes
and a stomach ache, for the former of which she was, apparently, supposed to go
straight to hospital since it could be a bad reaction to the chemo. She had
phoned for an ambulance and was waiting for a call back from some medical
professional. This person did call, asked a long series of questions about her
symptoms, then sent the ambulance, which arrived pretty quickly.
The ambulance staff came in, asked the same series of
questions while hooking her up to some equipment. By then her shakes were
waning and they couldn’t find anything seriously wrong with her (well, besides
being 85 and having cancer). However, after a phone call to the Oncology
Department they decided to take her in to Broomfield hospital. I followed the
ambulance there, stupidly expecting it to take the easy back roads route to the
hospital. It didn’t, it instead went right through the middle of Chelmsford
during the rush hour. I tried to keep on its tail but with various sets of
traffic lights and about five roundabouts to go through I was beginning to lose
sight of it. I had also completely forgotten how to get to the hospital via
this route and at some point I must have run a red light.
At the hospital I spend about twenty minutes driving around
in a two-storey car park searching for a spot to park, then I went into
Accident & Emergency where my mother had been taken. There she had an
X-ray, blood taken for testing, that list of questions asked again, and
frequent checks on her BP etc. The upshot was that a doctor would see her but
she could go home. We waited and waited for a doctor but none came, so in the
end just checked out and later.
Promptly, a few days after, I got my traffic violation
letter from Essex Police. I filled in the form and wrote a covering letter
explaining the circumstances. I didn’t expect any leniency.
Maybe a day after this the same thing happened again with my
mother: bad shakes, inability to sleep or keep still. I suspected something
related to her depression (yeah, she has that too). Sometimes, if you get a bad
panic attack it can feel like you’re dying. Phone calls ensued but I baulked at
the idea of calling an ambulance again, especially as the shakes were waning
again, and in the end took her to the emergency doctor. This quite sharp Asian
lady examined her and checked over her reams of prescription sheets.
Apparently she had been prescribed another lot of
anti-depressants because the chemo had dragged her down. Now, either the doctor
concerned neglected to notice she was already on one lot of pills, neglected to
tell her to stop taking them, or my mother failed to take in that she should
stop taking the first lot. ‘You don’t take these together,’ said the Asian
lady, looking puzzled and slightly alarmed. She told my mother to stop taking
the second lot and prescribed diazepam for the shakes and instructed her to see
her doctor. This she did and the upshot is that her problems were caused by
mixing the anti-depressants.
I next got a phone call from the Essex Police and spoke to
someone who wasn’t officious and was quite pleasant. After she got some detail
from me she told me they were dropping the charges against me. I subsequently received
a letter telling me this along with the line ‘not in the public interest to
prosecute’. Well I guess that’s right. The last time I was ever told off by the
police for a driving offence was when I was 18 and wasn’t displaying my
L-plates correctly. So that was my first encounter with the Essex Police…
On diazepam every day my mother improved enough to go on an
outing she had booked some time ago to Thursford. She went this Sunday with a friend, stayed overnight and came back on Monday
evening. Shortly after her return I got a phone call. Her house had been broken
into. I told her to call the police and then Caroline and I went round. Someone
had smashed a back patio door then opened it with the key. This person had
rifled through some cupboards and drawers, opened her jewellery box, but beyond
the smashed door made surprisingly little mess. He’d (I’m guessing it was a ‘he’)
found about £150 she’d kept in a drawer but otherwise seemed to have taken
nothing else. I guess he was quite disappointed by the lack of laptops, mobile
phones, family silver and by the costume jewellery.
A cop turned up quite rapidly from South Woodham Ferrers and
checked out everything. Shortly after he arrived a fingerprint lady turned up
(SOCO?) but could find nothing but glove smudges. After she had finished I
boarded up and secured the broken door while the cop sat with my mother taking down
details and telling her what would happen. Let me add here: pleasant big
reassuring bloke and exactly the kind of guy you want turning up. And that,
then, was my second encounter with the Essex Police.
Surprisingly, and perhaps sadly, though my reaction to this
was, ‘Bastards!’ I didn’t feel hugely irate. This is because a break-in like
this is almost a fulfilment of expectation. There are loads of shits out there
with no respect for other people’s property. But really I should be very very
angry. Back when I used to cut grass and hedges etc. for a living an old lady
who was a customer of mine found a burglar in her bedroom. He didn’t harm her
then and just fled. However, she died just a few months later and the opinion
of her neighbours was that the incident just sapped her will – effectively killed
her.
Today’s jobs: sort out a glazier and take a look at some
burglar alarms on the internet.
Note: If you go out take the keys out of the inside of your
double glazed doors. This won’t stop anyone smashing the glass and getting in, but the burglar will have to knock all the glass out of the door and go through
it, increasing the likelihood of him being cut and dripping some blood somewhere.
The police like blood.
Labels:
Bits
Monday, December 03, 2012
Exhausted by Doom-mongers.
I watched the TV series The Secret of Crickley Hall – last episode
last night – and though I enjoyed it I couldn’t really engage with it. I got
the same feeling watching it as I got from watching Woman in Black, which is
that though it was entertaining I could not suspend disbelief. When I was
younger I could watch this sort of stuff and feel a little bit spooked – two
that spring to mind are The Haunting (the original version) and The Entity –
but my opinions about the supernatural have hardened over the years and now I
simply cannot believe in ghosts. The films and the fiction haven’t really got
any worse, if anything some have got better, but I have changed.
By this route I come to those who keep launching assaults on
science fiction. I’d call it self-flagellation because often these people are ‘in’
the SF world, but for the fact that many of those attacking don’t actually
write the stuff. Science fiction is dying or dead, it’s no longer relevant
because of the accelerated pace of technological change (how could it not be
more relevant?), and the latest one ‘science fiction is exhausted’ - based on some Best SF collections so generalizing from the specific and ignoring Sturgeon's Law.
Moving on to the stuff about it being relevant in the rapidly
changing world: How can someone read recent books like Windup Girl or Quantum
Thief and dismiss them as irrelevant? Who says a requisite of SF is that it has
to be relevant? The job of a writer is first to write books and then to sell them.
The main requisite of the latter is to make them entertaining, and for them to
be that, for an SF reader, requires a good story that can suspend disbelief,
world building, the zing of technology and science and that essential
sensawunda.
Now let’s go back to ‘science fiction is dying, or dead’
(yawn). I’ve been here before with this here, here and here but the neatest way of putting this in perspective is via a link provided by Gary Farber in response to my, "I'm betting there was some
plonker declaring the death of SF the moment Sputnik beeped or just after Neil
Armstrong stepped onto the Moon."
Who Killed Science Fiction? won the Hugo Award for Best
Fanzine in 1961. The Fifties were rife with talk about the death of science
fiction, and Earl Kemp's symposia of so many sf pros and prominent fans summed
it all up.
If science fiction was dead back in the 50s and 60s, why does it
still seem so mobile now? If it was dying back then why isn’t it dead now? And
really, science fiction is nowhere as near as exhausted as the perpetual
wanking on about its decline.
Let’s have a little list: Iain M Banks, Alastair Reynolds,
Peter F Hamilton, Adam Roberts, Ted Chiang, C J Cherryh, Peter Watts, Gary
Gibson, Jon Courtenay Grimwood, Ken McLeod, Neil Gaiman, Paolo Bacigalupi, Jeff
Noon, Kim Stanley Robinson, Greg Egan, Hannu Rajaniemi, Stephen Baxter, Sheri
S. Tepper, Elizabeth Bear, Paul J. McAuley, Ian McDonald Greg Bear, David Brin, Orson Scott Card, Cory
Doctorow, John Meaney, John Scalzi, Kristine Kathryn Rusch … I could go on. Now,
as far as I know these are all still alive (though I don’t keep up with my
Ansible obituaries) and are still producing stuff people want to read. Whether
or not they are exhausted I don’t know, whether or not the fiction they produce
is dying, exhausted or dead I leave to you to decide.
All these attacks on science fiction are utterly subjective and ultimately pointless because, in the
end, they tell us more about the one writing than the fiction they are writing
about (much like many reviews). Perhaps they loved science fiction once and
could suspend disbelief, and now, just like me watching Crickley Hall, it simply
is not pressing the right buttons any more. Maybe they have changed.
Because you feel you have read it all before doesn’t mean
others have and equally, just because you might have become more discerning and sophisticated doesn’t
mean others are. Just because you are suffering ennui and have lost the
credulity and optimism of youth doesn’t mean others have. Just because you are
inured to wonder, and can no longer find that vital sensawunda, doesn’t mean it
has disappeared, dried up, been exhausted.
Maybe the next time somebody feels the urge to write
something about the terminal decline of SF, they should consider that the 'crisis' is in the eyes that behold, and take a long hard look
at themselves first.
Saturday, December 01, 2012
Comments
I’ve been noting how over the years the number of comments I
get here has been steadily waning. I could, if I was sufficiently paranoid, put
this down to a steady decline in my fan base, readership, popularity or
whatever. However I know by my stats here that the number of people visiting
this blog has been steadily increasing so, unless they’re stopping by to see how the road accident is progressing, something else must be going on.
Are people commenting less because of the time I spend away
from the internet in the summer; because they won’t be getting a quick reply
from me? That’s one possibility but there are others. The social media on the
internet is always changing. Message boards went through their high season and
waned. The likes of MySpace had their time in the sun then sloped off into the
shadows. Is it that blogs are now, in internet terms, a bit antediluvian? Are
all those who commented on message boards and blogs now using Twitter? Yeah, I
reckon it could be a bit of that too.
Then there’s how people access the internet now. Mobile
devices have been on the rise and no matter how wonderful they might be or how
many thousands of apps they might have they do not have the utility of a pc, at
a desk, with a chair. It’s my contention that the lack of response here does
not equate to a lack of readers, but the lack of the simple ease of a keyboard.
What do you think?
Labels:
Bits
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






