This was about synthetic biology – essentially genetic modification – and how far advanced it is now. In the program we see the spider goat – a goat that produces a useful spider silk in its milk – and a pre-production plant for making diesel from GM yeast as simply as alcohol is made from the normal kind. The advances are coming at an ever increasing pace what with people being able to do this stuff in home labs. They can buy ‘bricks’ which are chunks of DNA that express certain characteristics, over the Internet, and mix and match them. For example, a bunch of enthusiasts pasted a jellyfish gene into e-coli to make luminescent bacteria – this in the kind of lab any of us could put together in a garden shed.
This is massive; this is a game changer. As the presenter noted this is like Bill Gates putting together a computer in his garage.
Of course the presenter had to whiffle on about the ethics of it all and whether it should be done. All the objections were based on either the Abrahamic religions or the ones springing from the Church of Environmentalism, and of course the terror of change they like to stir up. However, it is far too late to put this one back in the box.
It has been said (well by me at least) that nothing dates faster than science fiction, and this program brought it home to me. In science fiction there’s a lot of talk about various kinds of singularity. It’s usually related to the creation of AI and is seen as an ‘intellectual event horizon, beyond which the future becomes difficult to understand or predict’. It occurs to me that science fiction itself is facing its own singularity of exactly the same kind. We’ve reached the stage now where between writing a book and it being published, part or all of the content of that book can go out of date. Of course with e-books the gap between writing and publishing can be closed but, in maybe just a little time, we’ll reach the point where even as we speculate or extrapolate we will be going out of date, then the point when we’ll simply be well behind the curve.
There has been (for a very long time) much talk about ‘the death of science fiction’. Maybe that will occur when the need for sensawunda, which we all look for in SF, is supplied by the news every day, or even in our day-to-day lives. If that happens I’m not sure I’ll be particularly upset about it.
5 comments:
*I'll* be upset by it... I love the Sensawunda... I will miss that chance to dream of far-flung futures.
Mind you, I have always wanted a Glow-in-the-Dark pet frog... or plant... or cat... or... well, just about anything non-venonous. ;)
My sensawunda was started by Arthur C. Clarke.
If only I had contacted him at age twelve...
a) i want to play god (and a nipple silk spinning goat).
b) i live in SF for a reason.
c) does any of this new science info affect what you wrote in the 'Owner' series? there must be a way to suppress any kind of information/experimentation like this and stick a huge price tag on it.
d) http://youtu.be/YQIMGV5vtd4
yes it is easy enough to express GFP (green fluorescent protein) in bacteria but the reagents are not cheap and you need to have a very clean shed (or you get contamination in your bacteria).
Furthermore, to maintain expression of the GFP protein, the plasmid (simply put a circle of DNA) also needs to produce an antibiotic resistance protein and you have to include the antibiotic in the culture medium - otherwise it the slowly fades away.
Getting genetic material into the 'base' genome i.e. the silk goat example is a totally different ball game and takes a lot of genetic work and then breeding (to get it to the stage where the goats off spring also make the silk).
Post a Comment